The cirros image was rebuilt against the 3.13.0-83 kernel, drivers e1000e, igbvf...

[packages/trusty/cirros-testvm.git] / cirros-testvm / src-cirros / buildroot-2015.05 / package / nfs-utils / 0006-Let-the-configure-script-find-getrpcbynumber-in-libt.patch

diff --git a/cirros-testvm/src-cirros/buildroot-2015.05/package/nfs-utils/0006-Let-the-configure-script-find-getrpcbynumber-in-libt.patch b/cirros-testvm/src-cirros/buildroot-2015.05/package/nfs-utils/0006-Let-the-configure-script-find-getrpcbynumber-in-libt.patch
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..1ca17b7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/cirros-testvm/src-cirros/buildroot-2015.05/package/nfs-utils/0006-Let-the-configure-script-find-getrpcbynumber-in-libt.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
+From 7ea7814a8b87a0faa50fb9f4a486bfd7a376f3fc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
+Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2012 18:53:03 +0100
+Subject: [PATCH] Let the configure script find getrpcbynumber in libtirpc
+
+The getrpcbynumber() function may not be available in the C library,
+but only in the libtirpc library. Take this into account when checking
+for the existence of getrpcbynumber() and getrpcbynumber_r().
+
+Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
+---
+ configure.ac |   10 +++++++++-
+ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
+
+diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
+index 41216c9..1bbecfa 100644
+--- a/configure.ac
++++ b/configure.ac
+@@ -390,7 +390,15 @@ AC_CHECK_FUNCS([alarm atexit dup2 fdatasync ftruncate getcwd \
+                getnameinfo getrpcbyname getifaddrs \
+                gettimeofday hasmntopt inet_ntoa innetgr memset mkdir pathconf \
+                realpath rmdir select socket strcasecmp strchr strdup \
+-               strerror strrchr strtol strtoul sigprocmask getrpcbynumber getrpcbynumber_r])
++               strerror strrchr strtol strtoul sigprocmask])
++
++save_CFLAGS=$CFLAGS
++save_LIBS=$LIBS
++CFLAGS="$CFLAGS $AM_CPPFLAGS"
++LIBS="$LIBS $LIBTIRPC"
++AC_CHECK_FUNCS([getrpcbynumber getrpcbynumber_r])
++CFLAGS=$save_CFLAGS
++LIBS=$save_LIBS
+ 
+ if test "$ac_cv_func_getrpcbynumber_r" != "yes" -a "$ac_cv_func_getrpcbynumber" != "yes"; then
+    AC_MSG_ERROR([Neither getrpcbynumber_r nor getrpcbynumber are available])
+-- 
+1.7.9.5
+