The cirros image was rebuilt against the 3.13.0-83 kernel, drivers e1000e, igbvf...

[packages/trusty/cirros-testvm.git] / cirros-testvm / src-cirros / buildroot-2015.05 / package / mysql / 0000-ac_cache_check.patch

diff --git a/cirros-testvm/src-cirros/buildroot-2015.05/package/mysql/0000-ac_cache_check.patch b/cirros-testvm/src-cirros/buildroot-2015.05/package/mysql/0000-ac_cache_check.patch
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..c3b55ba
--- /dev/null
+++ b/cirros-testvm/src-cirros/buildroot-2015.05/package/mysql/0000-ac_cache_check.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,156 @@
+Patch borrowed from
+http://code.google.com/p/minimyth/source/browse/trunk/gar-minimyth/script/db/mysql/files/mysql-5.1.47-ac_cache_check.patch?r=6493.
+
+It allows to override through ac_cv_* variables various checks that
+cannot be performed when cross-compiling.
+
+Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
+
+---
+ storage/innodb_plugin/plug.in |   59 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
+ 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
+
+Index: mysql-5.1.53/storage/innodb_plugin/plug.in
+===================================================================
+--- mysql-5.1.53.orig/storage/innodb_plugin/plug.in
++++ mysql-5.1.53/storage/innodb_plugin/plug.in
+@@ -53,9 +53,10 @@
+   esac
+   AC_SUBST(INNODB_DYNAMIC_CFLAGS)
+ 
+-  AC_MSG_CHECKING(whether GCC atomic builtins are available)
++  AC_CACHE_CHECK([whether GCC atomic builtins are available],
++                 [ac_cv_have_decl_HAVE_IB_GCC_ATOMIC_BUILTINS],
+   # either define HAVE_IB_GCC_ATOMIC_BUILTINS or not
+-  AC_TRY_RUN(
++  [AC_TRY_RUN(
+     [
+       int main()
+       {
+@@ -95,18 +96,23 @@
+       }
+     ],
+     [
+-      AC_DEFINE([HAVE_IB_GCC_ATOMIC_BUILTINS], [1],
+-                [GCC atomic builtins are available])
+       AC_MSG_RESULT(yes)
++      ac_cv_have_decl_HAVE_IB_GCC_ATOMIC_BUILTINS=yes
+     ],
+     [
+       AC_MSG_RESULT(no)
++      ac_cv_have_decl_HAVE_IB_GCC_ATOMIC_BUILTINS=no
+     ]
+-  )
++  )])
++  if test "x$ac_cv_have_decl_HAVE_IB_GCC_ATOMIC_BUILTINS"= "xyes" ; then
++    AC_DEFINE([HAVE_IB_GCC_ATOMIC_BUILTINS], [1],
++              [GCC atomic builtins are available])
++  fi
+ 
+-  AC_MSG_CHECKING(whether pthread_t can be used by GCC atomic builtins)
++  AC_CACHE_CHECK([whether pthread_t can be used by GCC atomic builtins],
++                 [ac_cv_have_decl_HAVE_IB_ATOMIC_PTHREAD_T_GCC],
+   # either define HAVE_IB_ATOMIC_PTHREAD_T_GCC or not
+-  AC_TRY_RUN(
++  [AC_TRY_RUN(
+     [
+       #include <pthread.h>
+       #include <string.h>
+@@ -126,14 +132,18 @@
+       }
+     ],
+     [
+-      AC_DEFINE([HAVE_IB_ATOMIC_PTHREAD_T_GCC], [1],
+-                [pthread_t can be used by GCC atomic builtins])
+       AC_MSG_RESULT(yes)
++      ac_cv_have_decl_HAVE_IB_ATOMIC_PTHREAD_T_GCC=yes
+     ],
+     [
+       AC_MSG_RESULT(no)
++      ac_cv_have_decl_HAVE_IB_ATOMIC_PTHREAD_T_GCC=no
+     ]
+-  )
++  )])
++  if test "x$ac_cv_have_decl_HAVE_IB_ATOMIC_PTHREAD_T_GCC"= "xyes" ; then
++    AC_DEFINE([HAVE_IB_ATOMIC_PTHREAD_T_GCC], [1],
++              [pthread_t can be used by GCC atomic builtins])
++  fi
+ 
+   AC_MSG_CHECKING(whether Solaris libc atomic functions are available)
+   # either define HAVE_IB_SOLARIS_ATOMICS or not
+@@ -148,9 +158,10 @@
+                           are available])
+   )
+ 
+-  AC_MSG_CHECKING(whether pthread_t can be used by Solaris libc atomic functions)
++  AC_CACHE_CHECK([whether pthread_t can be used by Solaris libc atomic functions],
++                 [ac_cv_have_decl_HAVE_IB_ATOMIC_PTHREAD_T_SOLARIS],
+   # either define HAVE_IB_ATOMIC_PTHREAD_T_SOLARIS or not
+-  AC_TRY_RUN(
++  [AC_TRY_RUN(
+     [
+       #include <pthread.h>
+       #include <string.h>
+@@ -181,28 +192,33 @@
+       }
+     ],
+     [
+-      AC_DEFINE([HAVE_IB_ATOMIC_PTHREAD_T_SOLARIS], [1],
+-                [pthread_t can be used by solaris atomics])
+       AC_MSG_RESULT(yes)
++      ac_cv_have_decl_HAVE_IB_ATOMIC_PTHREAD_T_SOLARIS=yes
+     ],
+     [
+       AC_MSG_RESULT(no)
++      ac_cv_have_decl_HAVE_IB_ATOMIC_PTHREAD_T_SOLARIS=no
+     ]
+-  )
++  )])
++  if test "x$ac_cv_have_decl_HAVE_IB_ATOMIC_PTHREAD_T_SOLARIS"= "xyes" ; then
++    AC_DEFINE([HAVE_IB_ATOMIC_PTHREAD_T_SOLARIS], [1],
++              [pthread_t can be used by solaris atomics])
++  fi
+ 
+   # this is needed to know which one of atomic_cas_32() or atomic_cas_64()
+   # to use in the source
+   AC_CHECK_SIZEOF([pthread_t], [], [#include <pthread.h>])
+ 
+   # Check for x86 PAUSE instruction
+-  AC_MSG_CHECKING(for x86 PAUSE instruction)
++  AC_CACHE_CHECK([for x86 PAUSE instruction],
++                 [ac_cv_have_decl_HAVE_IB_PAUSE_INSTRUCTION],
+   # We have to actually try running the test program, because of a bug
+   # in Solaris on x86_64, where it wrongly reports that PAUSE is not
+   # supported when trying to run an application. See
+   # http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/printableBug.do?bug_id=6478684
+   # We use ib_ prefix to avoid collisoins if this code is added to
+   # mysql's configure.in.
+-  AC_TRY_RUN(
++  [AC_TRY_RUN(
+     [
+       int main() {
+         __asm__ __volatile__ ("pause");
+@@ -210,16 +226,21 @@
+       }
+     ],
+     [
+-      AC_DEFINE([HAVE_IB_PAUSE_INSTRUCTION], [1], [Does x86 PAUSE instruction exist])
+       AC_MSG_RESULT(yes)
++      ac_cv_have_decl_HAVE_IB_PAUSE_INSTRUCTION=yes
+     ],
+     [
+       AC_MSG_RESULT(no)
++      ac_cv_have_decl_HAVE_IB_PAUSE_INSTRUCTION=no
+     ],
+     [
+       AC_MSG_RESULT(no)
++      ac_cv_have_decl_HAVE_IB_PAUSE_INSTRUCTION=no
+     ]
+-  )
++  )])
++  if test "x$ac_cv_have_decl_HAVE_IB_PAUSE_INSTRUCTION"= "xyes" ; then
++    AC_DEFINE([HAVE_IB_PAUSE_INSTRUCTION], [1], [Does x86 PAUSE instruction exist])
++  fi
+   ])
+ 
+ # vim: set ft=config: