The cirros image was rebuilt against the 3.13.0-83 kernel, drivers e1000e, igbvf...

[packages/trusty/cirros-testvm.git] / cirros-testvm / src-cirros / buildroot-2015.05 / package / cups / 0002-fix-stack-protector-check.patch

diff --git a/cirros-testvm/src-cirros/buildroot-2015.05/package/cups/0002-fix-stack-protector-check.patch b/cirros-testvm/src-cirros/buildroot-2015.05/package/cups/0002-fix-stack-protector-check.patch
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..1db35ff
--- /dev/null
+++ b/cirros-testvm/src-cirros/buildroot-2015.05/package/cups/0002-fix-stack-protector-check.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+[PATCH]: use AC_TRY_LINK for stack protector check
+
+Actually try to link an executable to test for stack protector support,
+as gcc seems to accept the -fstack-protector argument even when it's
+compiled with --disable-libssp (but linking fails with a error
+finding -lssp_nonshared).
+
+Signed-off-by: Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@sunsite.dk>
+---
+ config-scripts/cups-compiler.m4 |    2 +-
+ 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
+
+Index: cups-1.3.9/config-scripts/cups-compiler.m4
+===================================================================
+--- cups-1.3.9.orig/config-scripts/cups-compiler.m4
++++ cups-1.3.9/config-scripts/cups-compiler.m4
+@@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ if test -n "$GCC"; then
+       AC_MSG_CHECKING(if GCC supports -fstack-protector)
+       OLDCFLAGS="$CFLAGS"
+       CFLAGS="$CFLAGS -fstack-protector"
+-      AC_TRY_COMPILE(,,
++      AC_TRY_LINK(,,
+               OPTIM="$OPTIM -fstack-protector"
+               AC_MSG_RESULT(yes),
+               AC_MSG_RESULT(no))