From 91e7e3b141adedea01a78fa2819f2b0c7a9069bf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Steve Baker <sbaker@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2012 17:26:34 +1300
Subject: [PATCH] Make sure heat uses its own control_exchange

Due to this recent discussion
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2012-November/003578.html

And the commit message in this change
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/12518/

Change-Id: Icf7ee0475045a3d0a19b8d176162bd7286a39ddc
---
 heat/common/config.py | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/heat/common/config.py b/heat/common/config.py
index f3947e8f..25662fb8 100644
--- a/heat/common/config.py
+++ b/heat/common/config.py
@@ -110,6 +110,9 @@ cfg.StrOpt('host',
            default=socket.gethostname(),
            help='Name of the engine node.  This can be an opaque identifier.'
                 'It is not necessarily a hostname, FQDN, or IP address.'),
+cfg.StrOpt('control_exchange',
+           default='heat',
+           help='AMQP exchange to connect to if using RabbitMQ or Qpid'),
 cfg.StrOpt('engine_topic',
            default='engine',
            help='the topic engine nodes listen on')
-- 
2.45.2