]> review.fuel-infra Code Review - openstack-build/neutron-build.git/commit
Elaborate how priorities are assigned to blueprints
authorarmando-migliaccio <armamig@gmail.com>
Wed, 11 Nov 2015 21:05:46 +0000 (13:05 -0800)
committerarmando-migliaccio <armamig@gmail.com>
Tue, 17 Nov 2015 07:26:09 +0000 (23:26 -0800)
commiteb3eefaea0615f7c6f279a8c8b59b65277973741
tree7ebc187d150aa4925d60fdd3b04037df83e03700
parent772b3e3df3b6c1c63a435b3b980903e583ff80db
Elaborate how priorities are assigned to blueprints

Prioritizing is hard, and prioritizing in open source, let
alone Openstack, is even harder.

For this reason, this proposal attempts to clarify what priority
mean, how we prioritize in Neutron, in a way that's objective,
consistent, and reproducible. To start with, and make things slightly
simpler, we reduce the number of priority buckets we can choose from
to two: High and Low.

The way priorities are assigned is then based on a set of clearly defined
criteria: high priority work items are items that all core folks
collectively should care about because any failure in achieving tangible
result make them look bad. Low work items are great to have, but if they
slipped, it would be a shame but not the end of the world.

Keep on reading to learn more.

Change-Id: I0f4ba622eb3d8e02b0c3204967fb8eae22db09c8
doc/source/policies/blueprints.rst